序 · Prologue
达沃斯的提问 · The Question from Davos
In January 2023, at the World Economic Forum—the annual, invitation-only gathering of global business and political leaders in Davos, Switzerland—several dozen Asia-focused CEOs and senior executives of the world’s largest companies gathered for a private dinner. The topic of the evening: China.
2023 年 1 月,世界经济论坛——在瑞士达沃斯举办的年度闭门聚会,聚集全球商界与政界领袖——数十位聚焦亚洲的 CEO 和全球最大公司的高管共进一场私人晚宴。当晚话题:中国。
The gathering was hosted by McKinsey & Company and moderated by Joe Ngai, the Firm’s Greater China chairman and one of this book’s co-authors. He’d led dozens of similar discussions over the years, but the mood that night was different. The executives in the room were leaders who’d invested heavily in—and benefited from—China’s rise of the past two decades. Collectively, they commanded operations employing tens of thousands, supply chains spanning dozens of provinces, brands recognized globally from Shanghai to London to Abu Dhabi. And yet, for the first time in memory, the conversation wasn’t about growth targets or market expansion; it was about whether their China strategies still worked at all. Questions came quickly, circling what we’d titled the evening’s discussion: “unprecedented headwinds”—or the collision of economic uncertainty, geopolitical tension, and rapid technological change: When would China’s housing downturn stabilize? Should our board be anxious about the slowdown in consumer confidence? Do we expand India operations as a hedge to China?
这场晚宴由麦肯锡公司主办,倪以理主持——他是麦肯锡大中华区主席,也是本书合著者之一。多年来他主持过数十场类似的讨论,但那一晚的氛围不同。在座的高管们,都是过去二十年中国崛起的深度参与者与受益者:他们掌管的业务雇佣着数以万计的员工,供应链横跨数十个省份,品牌从上海到伦敦再到阿布扎比全球知名。然而,记忆中头一次,谈话内容不再是增长目标或市场扩张,而是他们的中国战略是否还管用。问题接踵而至,围绕当晚的讨论主题——"前所未有的逆风":经济不确定性、地缘政治紧张与技术快速变革的碰撞。中国楼市的下行何时企稳?董事会该为消费信心的放缓而焦虑吗?要不要扩张印度业务,作为对冲中国的备选?
Beneath each question lay the same unease: whether China’s role as the engine of global growth—the foundation upon which so much progress had been built—was coming to an end. After guests stepped back out into the snow, a journalist lingered in the hallway and asked Joe what had become a recurrent boardroom query: “If this is the reality now,” he said, “where does the next opportunity lie?” The question followed naturally: “What’s the next China?”
每个问题底下是同样的不安:中国作为全球增长引擎的角色——那么多进步建立其上的基石——是否正在终结。客人散去、步入雪中后,一位记者在走廊里停留,问乔一个董事会里反复出现的问题:"如果现实已是如此,"他说,"下一个机会在哪里?"问题自然而然地接续着:"下一个中国在哪?"
The query, of course, wasn’t philosophical but practical. Which country—or combination of countries—would replace China as the world’s next engine of growth, profits, and scale? Throughout the week at Davos, the notion “China + 1” dominated private conversations—the imperative of finding alternatives to China as the country labored through geopolitical challenges, overcapacity, weakening sentiment from consumers and investors alike, and rapid technological change.
这个问题当然不是哲学性的,而是实际的。哪个国家——或哪几个国家的组合——将取代中国,成为全球增长、利润与规模的下一个引擎?在达沃斯的一周里,"中国+1"的概念主导了私下讨论——在中国艰难应对地缘政治挑战、产能过剩、消费者与投资者情绪双双低迷以及技术快速变革之际,寻找中国替代方案成了当务之急。
While Joe fielded questions in Davos, Nick Leung—his predecessor as McKinsey’s China head and this book’s other co-author—was halfway around the world in Shenzhen, the glass-and-steel city at the heart of China’s manufacturing ecosystem. He was leading a procurement workshop for a multinational client whose China footprint was foundational to its competitive advantage—dense supplier networks, specialized tooling clusters, production lines calibrated for speed and precision, and a labor force that could scale up or down by the hour. The stakes were high enough to draw the global CEO into the room.
当乔在达沃斯应答提问时,梁敦临——他的前任、麦肯锡中国业务负责人、本书另一位合著者——正身处地球另一端的深圳,这座处于中国制造生态系统核心的钢铁与玻璃之城。他正在为一家跨国客户主持采购工作坊,该客户在中国的布局是其竞争优势的基础——密集的供应商网络、专业的工装集群、为速度与精度校准的生产线,以及能以小时为单位伸缩的劳动力。利害关系大到全球 CEO 亲自到场。
The directive from headquarters was clear: find an alternative. Costs were rising. Policy risk felt harder to navigate. The company needed options, and it needed them now. Nick and his teams had spent months stress-testing scenarios. Yet every alternative led to the same judgment: “There are no great substitutes—we must choose the least bad option.” In other countries, the promise of stability and efficiency proved fragile. Rising wages and input costs eroded gains. The frictions of “friend-shoring”—logistical delays, substandard infrastructure, quality inconsistencies, a lack of institutional knowledge—piled up. Finally, the CEO voiced what everyone in the room was thinking: “We’re starting to realize how much we’ve taken China’s ecosystem for granted.”
总部的指令很明确:寻找替代方案。成本在上升,政策风险更难驾驭。公司需要选项,而且现在就要。梁和他的团队花了数月做情景压力测试。然而,每个替代方案都指向同一个判断:"没有好的替代品——我们只能选择最不坏的选项。"在其他国家,"稳定与高效"的承诺被证明是脆弱的。工资与投入品成本上涨侵蚀了收益;"友岸外包"的摩擦不断累积——物流延误、基础设施不达标、质量参差不齐、缺乏制度性知识。最后,CEO 说出了在场所有人的心声:"我们开始意识到,我们对中国的生态习以为常、视为理所当然了。"
No other country pairs the world’s most advanced supply chains with its largest consumer base. In China, companies can launch faster, adjust in real time, and iterate—refining and improving with each repetition—inside of a digitally connected, highly competitive marketplace in which innovation is a condition of survival. Is it any wonder, then, that this combination of scale, speed, and depth has proven so hard to find elsewhere?
没有哪个国家能同时拥有全球最先进的供应链与最大的消费群体。在中国,公司能更快发布产品、实时调整、持续迭代——在每一次循环中精进——置身于一个数字互联、竞争极度激烈的市场,在这里,创新是生存的条件。那么,规模、速度与深度的这种组合,为何在别处如此难觅,也就不足为奇了。
Against this backdrop, a pattern began to emerge. In Davos, executives were asking “What’s the next China?” In Shenzhen, Nick was watching a client discover there were no good answers. Across dozens of similar conversations, in boardrooms, forums, workshops, the same reality kept surfacing. The companies searching hardest for alternatives were having trouble finding the answers they wanted—not because China was getting easier, but because replicating what China has to offer proved impossible anywhere else.
在这样的背景下,一种规律开始浮现。在达沃斯,高管们问"下一个中国在哪";在深圳,梁亲眼看着客户发现没有好的答案。在数十场类似的对话中——董事会、论坛、工作坊——同一个现实反复浮现:那些拼命寻找替代方案的公司,恰恰难以找到想要的答案——不是因为中国变得更容易,而是因为在别处复制中国所能提供的一切,被证明是不可能的。
The realization crystallized six weeks after Davos, on a flight over the South China Sea. The conclusion felt almost too simple: The next China is China.
这个领悟在达沃斯六周后、在飞越南中国海的航班上变得清晰。结论简单得几乎难以置信:下一个中国就是中国。
Joe posted it on LinkedIn, expecting a ripple. Instead, it exploded. The phrase had circulated before, rolled out whenever an obstacle had emerged or a sector lulled. This time, it landed differently, generating more than twenty-eight thousand mentions across Chinese and global media, from the China Daily to CNBC to Bloomberg. Over the months that followed, multinational and Chinese clients alike began asking us to take the idea into board and investor meetings. A consumer goods CEO asked us to brief the board on whether the “consumer depression” headlines were real. A private equity founder invited us to his limited partners investor day to discuss which segments remain investable. An entrepreneur asked, over lunch, how to reorganize his company for overseas growth.
乔把它发在 LinkedIn 上,以为只是一点涟漪。结果,爆了。这句话此前也曾流传——每当有障碍出现或某个行业沉寂时都会被翻出来。这一次它产生了截然不同的反响,在中国与全球媒体上获得了超过两万八千条提及,从《中国日报》到 CNBC 再到彭博。接下来的几个月里,跨国公司与中企客户都开始请我们把这个想法带进董事会和投资者会议。一位消费品公司 CEO 请我们向董事会简报:"消费萧条"的标题新闻是否属实。一位私募基金创始人邀请我们参加他的有限合伙人投资者日,讨论哪些细分板块仍可投资。一位企业家在午餐时问,如何重组公司以实现海外增长。
We’ve been careful—then and now—to be precise about what we’re saying. Growth in China is slowing. The economy is maturing. Competition is intense, corporate debt has climbed, and weaker consumer confidence has struggled to offset the economic drag from a prolonged property downturn. This isn’t the China of 2010 or even 2019. It’s a reset, and the contrast with the past two decades of breakneck growth feels jarring.
我们一直很小心——过去和现在——把要说的话说准确。中国的增长在放缓。经济在成熟。竞争激烈,企业债务攀升,消费信心疲弱,难以对冲长期房地产下行带来的经济拖累。这不是 2010 年甚至 2019 年的中国。这是一次重置(reset),与过去二十年高速增长的对比令人刺眼。
But the numbers tell a more durable story. At just 2 percent annual growth, China would add output over the next decade equivalent to today’s entire Indian economy; at 5 percent—the government’s target—it would be like adding an India, Japan, and Indonesia combined. Already the world’s second biggest economy and the largest by purchasing power parity (PPP), China is the top trading partner for more than 120 countries—far more than any other single economy—and accounts for about 30 percent of global growth.
但数字讲述了一个更持久的故事。即便只有 2% 的年增长,中国未来十年新增的产出也相当于今天整个印度经济的体量;若按 5%——政府的目标——则相当于新增一个印度、一个日本和一个印度尼西亚之和。中国已是世界第二大经济体、按购买力平价(PPP)计的全球最大经济体,是 120 多个国家的最大贸易伙伴——远超任何其他单一经济体——并贡献了全球增长的大约 30%。
No collection of “speedboats” can displace the same water moved by a supertanker. In terms of raw growth, beyond its former quantitative role, China is likely to play a larger role qualitatively—increasingly shaping the technologies, business models, and industries of the future. Its companies are among the leaders in sixteen of the eighteen high-growth “arenas of competition” that McKinsey identifies as future engines of global value—from AI software and cloud infrastructure to electric vehicles, e-commerce, and consumer internet.
任何一组"快艇"都排不开一艘"超级油轮"激起的水量。就原始增长而言,中国在过往的数量角色之外,很可能扮演更大的质量角色——越来越多地塑造未来的技术、商业模式与产业。在麦肯锡认定的十八个高增长"竞争竞技场"——从 AI 软件、云基础设施到电动汽车、电商与消费互联网——中,中国企业在十六个中位居领先。
We’re not suggesting competing in the next China will be easy—if anything, it’ll be harder. The bar for success has risen, outcomes will diverge more sharply, and only companies willing to fundamentally rethink how they compete will endure. This transition to the next China will be both macroeconomic—from hard manufacturing toward services and IP creation—and microeconomic, demanding new capabilities: operating across borders, building and defending global footprints and brands, managing IP at scale, and embedding AI and robotics. For Chinese firms, it means extending global reach and organizational sophistication; for foreign multinationals, it means moving beyond merely selling into China toward partnering and building within its innovative ecosystems. For both, the rewards remain significant for those that can continue to adapt.
我们不是说在"下一个中国"竞争会容易——恰恰相反,只会更难。成功的门槛提高了,结果分化会更剧烈,只有愿意从根本上重新思考竞争方式的公司才能存活。向"下一个中国"的转变既是宏观的——从硬制造转向服务与知识产权创造——也是微观的,要求新的能力:跨境运营、构建并捍卫全球足迹与品牌、规模化地管理知识产权、嵌入 AI 与机器人。对中企,这意味着延伸全球触达与组织成熟度;对外国跨国公司,意味着超越"仅仅卖进中国",转向在其创新生态内合作与共建。对两者而言,只要能持续适应,回报依然可观。
We don’t believe in one-size-fits-all playbooks. Consider this book a navigator’s chart—drawn from decades of experience in China—which maps long-running currents as well as hidden risks. The forces we describe will persist, but tactics, timing, and execution must constantly evolve.
我们不相信放之四海皆准的剧本。把这本书看作一张航海图——以数十年中国经验绘制——既标注了长流的洋流,也标注了暗藏的风险。我们描述的力量会持续存在,但战术、时机与执行必须不断演进。
We hope you’ll come along for the ride. As we will show, understanding how to compete and win in China will equip you to succeed anywhere. The next China is still China; the real question is whether it’s for you.
希望你们一路同行。我们将证明,理解如何在中国竞争并获胜,将让你具备在任何地方成功的本领。下一个中国仍然是中国;真正的问题是,它是否属于你。